Studia humana (SH) is a multi-disciplinary peer reviewed journal publishing valuable
contributions on any aspect of human sciences such as...


Wojciech Krysztofiak

Wojciech Krysztofiak (degraded professor of the University of Szczecin due to worldview reasons) - author of scientific articles in the following journals: "Synthese", "Husserl Studies", "Axiomathes", "Semiotica", "Filozofia Nauki", "History and Philosophy of Logic", "Foundations of Science ", "Ruch Filozoficzny"; author of books: "Egzystencjalizm logiczny. Metafizyczne studium nad Traktatem logiczno-filozoficznym Wittgensteina", "Gramatyka dyskursu filozoficznego", "Problem opozycji realizmu i idealizmu epistemologicznego"; scholarship holder: The Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities, The Soros Foundation-Open Society Institute-Central European University; the honorary member of The Rationalist  International, the member of USERN; winner of research grants from the National Science Center: in 2013-2015 (on mental counting mechanisms) and in 2017-2019 (on narrative space profiling mechanisms); under surveillance in 1988 by the communist Security Service (SB) in an operation code-named "Krytyka".



Logical Consequence Operators and Etatism

Issue: 9:3/4 (the thirty fifth/sixth issue)
In the paper, there is presented the theory of logical consequence operators
indexed with taboo functions. It describes the mechanisms of logical inference
in the environment of forbidden sentences. This kind of processes take place in
ideological discourses within which their participants create various narrative
worlds (mental worlds). A peculiar feature of ideological discourses is their
association with taboo structures of deduction which penalize speech acts. The
development of discourse involves, among others, transforming its deduction
structure towards the proliferation of consequence operators and modifying
penalty functions. The presented theory enables to define various processes of
these transformations in the precise way. It may be used in analyses of conflicts
between competing elm experts acting within a discourse.